foodfacts logo
  • Articles
    
    Latest
    arrow pointing right
    All Fact Checks
    arrow pointing right
    Guides
    arrow pointing right
    Features
    arrow pointing right
    Opinion Pieces
    arrow pointing right
    Topics
    The Climate Crisis
    Politics Of Food
    Health
    Food Systems
    Media Literacy
    Popular Media
    Ethics
    Environment
    Nutrition
    Trending Tags
    Supplements
    Vitamins
    Acidic Foods
    Alkaline Diets
    Autism Spectrum Disorder
    Education
    Microwaves
    Artificial Intelligence
    Lab-Grown Meat
    (UPF) Ultra Processed Foods
    Chemophobia
    Precision Livestock Farming (PLF)
    Manosphere
    Net Zero
    Glossary
    arrow pointing right
    Fact Checks
    Is excess iron a cancer risk? Debunking Dr Eric Berg’s claim with peer-reviewed evidence
    Does yoghurt cause gut disruption?
    “I changed my diet and got pregnant”: What’s the evidence behind these claims?
  • Take Action
  • About
    
    • About
    • The Team
    • Fact Checking Policies
    • Funding/Disclosures
    • Advisory Board
    • Media Mentions
    • FAQs
  • Watchlist
Report MisinfoSupport Us
Home
/
Articles
/
Fact Check
/
Nutrition
/
A woman holds a chicken leg and a packet of pasta, comparing the claimed benefits of animal products to manage type-2 diabetes.
clock icon
Summary
3
 min read
Article
3
 min read
Dig Deeper
3
 min read
Resources
SOURCE:
Fact Check

Can we reverse Type 2 Diabetes with an animal-based diet?

Commentary by
Sapna Peruvemba, MS, RDN (Volunteer)
Expert Review by
No items found.
Fact-check by
Sapna Peruvemba, MS, RDN (Volunteer)
Published:
October 2, 2025
,
Updated:
December 4, 2025
clock icon
Summary
3
 min read
clock icon
Article
3
 min read
clock icon
Details
3
 min read
clock icon
Resources
3
 min read
Share

🔊Listen to the article

Loading the Elevenlabs Text to Speech AudioNative Player...
Fact Score:
What is the fact score?
i
Red: False
Coral Red: Mostly False
Orange: Misleading
Yellow: Mostly True
Green: True

Learn more about our fact-checking policies
Introduction

In a recent social media collaboration, multiple advocates for the carnivore diet, including @thatcarnivorenurse, Shawn Baker, and doctors Robert Kiltz and Anthony Chaffee, made the claim that eating an animal-based diet could ‘reverse type II diabetes’. 

An excerpt:

“To reverse it [type II diabetes], you must change your lifestyle. Taking medications will not address this. Here is what you must do: stabilise blood sugar levels, lower insulin, shrink your fat cells, grow your muscles. The healthiest way to do this is to: Cut out all ultra-processed foods. Cut out all high-carbohydrate foods: grains, pasta, bread, cereal, fruit, honey, potato. Replace these carbohydrates with animal fats: tallow, butter, ghee, lard. Centre all your meals around fatty meat, seafood, eggs.” (Lucy, aka @thatcarnivorenurse on Instagram, July 1, 2025)

This fact-check evaluates the accuracy of those claims against current scientific evidence.

TLDR; (Let's get to the point)
IN A NUTSHELL:
The claim that an animal-based diet does not worsen type II diabetes, and may even reverse it, is inaccurate.

The best evidence shows that diets high in animal fats do not reverse type 2 diabetes — and may actually increase risk. Plant-forward, high-fibre diets remain the most effective for prevention and management.

WHY SHOULD YOU KEEP SCROLLING? 👇👇

Type 2 diabetes is estimated to affect over 460 million individuals worldwide. People living with the condition are often faced with an overwhelming amount of advice online, and it can be hard to know what’s reliable. It's true that type 2 diabetes can be "reversed" - blood sugar levels returning to normal without medication. This usually requires lifestyle changes including dietary modifications. However, cutting out whole food groups or eating mostly animal products is not supported by science. Such advice carries potential risks, including nutrient deficiencies and other health complications.

Fact checked by
Sapna Peruvemba, MS, RDN (Volunteer)

Be cautious of “all-or-nothing” claims—for example, demonising entire food groups like carbohydrates. Nutrition is rarely that simple.

Dig deeper
What’s the full story? Keep reading for our expert analysis.

To understand claims about dietary changes and type 2 diabetes, it helps to start with how the condition affects the body. In type 2 diabetes, the body’s cells don’t respond properly to insulin, the hormone that helps lower blood sugar. This means that no matter how much insulin the pancreas produces, diabetic individuals end up with all that sugar in their blood. Because of this, lifestyle strategies such as dietary changes can play an important role in managing the condition, though these are best pursued with the guidance of qualified health professionals. 

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Lucy (@thatcarnivorenurse)

Claim 1: “The healthiest way to do this is to: Cut out all ultra-processed foods.”

Fact-check: Cutting out soda, chips, candy, and greasy fast foods is universally recommended! However, not all foods classified as “ultra-processed” are harmful. The NOVA classification defines ultra-processed foods as those containing industrial ingredients like high-fructose corn syrup, hydrogenated oils, and flavour agents that are not found in our kitchens. But it also lumps in foods that can be healthy and convenient — like canned beans, fortified plant milks, or whole-grain breads with preservatives —  simply if they have one of these ingredients. 

A 2023 synthesis of three large cohorts found that ultra-processed food intake overall was linked to higher diabetes risk — but when broken down, refined grains, sugary drinks, and animal products increased risk, while whole-grain breads and fruit products reduced it. So avoiding sodas, sweets, and greasy fast food is clearly beneficial, but labelling all ultra-processed foods as harmful oversimplifies the evidence and may discourage people from choosing affordable, nutritious options that support diabetes management.

A typical fast food meal of a burger, onion rings, potato chips, and cola
Most fast-food options are considered as ultra-processed food. Photo - Canva

Claim 2: “Cut out all high-carbohydrate foods: grains, pasta, bread, cereal, fruit, honey, potato.”

Fact-check: While it is true that managing carbohydrate intake is central to diabetes care, this does not mean eliminating carbohydrates altogether but rather choosing high quality carbs. 

The American Diabetes Association, for example, recommends that carbohydrates make up roughly a quarter of the plate, with an emphasis on whole grains, beans, vegetables, and fruits. That is because these foods provide fibre, vitamins, minerals, and phytochemicals that not only support general health but also help regulate blood sugar through various mechanisms in the body. For example, whole grains like brown rice, quinoa, whole wheat bread versus refined grains like instant cereals, while rice and bread, crackers, chips, etc.

Extensive research backs this up. Meta-analyses show that people who eat more whole grains, fruits (excluding fruit juice), and beans/lentils (source, source) have lower insulin resistance, better lipid and glycemic control, lower body weight, and reduced risk for developing type II diabetes. So saying that all high-carbohydrate foods should be avoided oversimplies the science and may deprive people of foods that can actually help with blood sugar control.

Various sources of carbohydrates, such as bread, grains, and pasta
Typical sources of carbohydrates include grains, pasta, bread, and cereals. Photo - Canva

Claim 3:  “Replace these carbohydrates with animal fats: tallow, butter, ghee, lard. Centre all your meals around fatty meat, seafood, eggs.”

Fact check: This advice directly contradicts decades of scientific evidence and the recommendations of major health organisations. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease are often called “sister diseases” because they share common risk factors: obesity, hypertension, inflammation, dyslipidemia, and insulin resistance. Any effective dietary intervention for diabetes must also reduce cardiovascular risk, not increase it. 

High intake of animal protein has repeatedly been linked to increased risk of type 2 diabetes. For example, in three large U.S. cohort studies, raising red meat consumption by just ½ serving per day increased diabetes risk by nearly 50%. In contrast, replacing one daily serving of red meat with legumes or nuts lowered diabetes risk by 30%. Vegetarians consistently show a lower risk of type 2 diabetes than omnivores—evidence that contradicts the idea that animal products are essential for diabetes reversal.

While the claim is that type 2 diabetes can be reversed by stabilising blood sugar, lowering insulin, and shrinking fat cells, clinical trials show that plant-based diets can accomplish all three. Following a low-fat plant-based diet improved weight and blood sugar, reduced diabetes medications, improved beta-cell function, insulin sensitivity, and significantly reduced fat in liver and muscle cells—key drivers of insulin resistance.

These findings align with recommendations from the World Health Organization, American Diabetes Association, and the British Diabetic Association, which recommend limiting saturated fats and choosing lean proteins to prevent lipid abnormalities (high triglycerides, elevated LDL-C, and low HDL-C) that contribute to atherosclerosis. Tallow, butter, ghee, lard, and fatty meats are high in saturated fats, which experts advise limiting for better long-term health. A Nature Medicine study found that diets rich in plant-based unsaturated fats were associated with lower rates of both type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, compared with diets high in saturated animal fats.

Final take-away

These claims misrepresent nutritional science by ignoring evidence linking animal protein to type 2 diabetes, oversimplifying advice by cutting out entire food groups, and downplaying decades of research and global health guidelines. While small amounts of lean animal products can fit into balanced diets, the strongest evidence supports plant-based patterns, which consistently improve blood sugar control and cardiovascular outcomes. This type of narrative can also leave people feeling uncertain about who to trust, pulling them away from healthcare professionals and making it harder to feel confident in safe, evidence-based options.

‍

We have contacted Lucy Fabbri and are awaiting a response.

Disclaimer

This fact-check is intended to provide information based on available scientific evidence. It should not be considered as medical advice. For personalised health guidance, consult with a qualified healthcare professional.

EXPERT WEIGH-IN
No items found.
EXPERT WEIGH-IN
No items found.
EXPERT WEIGH-IN
No items found.

Sources

Monteiro, C.A., et al. (2019). “Ultra-processed foods, diet quality, and health using the NOVA classification system.” 

Chen, Z. et al. (2023). “Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: Three Large Prospective U.S. Cohort Studies.”

American Diabetes Association (2025). “What is the Diabetes Plate?”

Riccardi, G. & Rivellese, A.A. (1991). “Effects of Dietary Fiber and Carbohydrate on Glucose and Lipoprotein Metabolism in Diabetic Patients.”

Raghuvanshi, D.S. et al. (2023). “Relationship Between Vitamins and Diabetes.”

Situmorang, P.C. et al. (2025). “Harnessing phytochemicals to combat diabetes: Insights into molecular pathways and therapeutic advances.”

Aune, D. et al. (2013). “Whole grain and refined grain consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of cohort studies.”

BMJ (2013). “Fruit consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: results from three prospective longitudinal cohort studies.”

Becerra-Tomàs, N. et al. (2018). “Legume consumption is inversely associated with type 2 diabetes incidence in adults: A prospective assessment from the PREDIMED study.”

Hafiz, M.S. (2021). “Pulse consumption improves indices of glycemic control in adults with and without type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of acute and long-term randomized controlled trials.”

Saldanha de Mattos Matheus, A. et al. (2013). “Impact of Diabetes on Cardiovascular Disease: An Update.”

Sluijs, I. et al. (2009). “Dietary Intake of Total, Animal, and Vegetable Protein and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-NL Study.”

Pan, A. et al. (2013). “Changes in Red Meat Consumption and Subsequent Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Three Cohorts of US Men and Women.”

Gu, X. et al. (2023). “Red meat intake and risk of type 2 diabetes in a prospective cohort study of United States females and males.”

Lee, Y. & Park, K. (2017). “Adherence to a Vegetarian Diet and Diabetes Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.”

Barnard, N.D. et al. (2006). “A Low-Fat Vegan Diet Improves Glycemic Control and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in a Randomized Clinical Trial in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes.”

Kahleova, H. et al. (2018). “A Plant-Based Dietary Intervention Improves Beta-Cell Function and Insulin Resistance in Overweight Adults: A 16-Week Randomized Clinical Trial.”

Kahleova, H. et al. (2020). “Effect of a Low-Fat Vegan Diet on Body Weight, Insulin Sensitivity, Postprandial Metabolism, and Intramyocellular and Hepatocellular Lipid Levels in Overweight Adults. A Randomized Clinical Trial.”

WHO (2023). “Saturated Fatty Acid and Trans-Fatty Acid Intake for Adults and Children: WHO Guideline.”

American Diabetes Association. “Fats.”

Diabetes UK. “Fats and Diabetes.”

Eichelmann, F. et al. (2024). “Lipidome changes due to improved dietary fat quality inform cardiometabolic risk reduction and precision nutrition.”

Expert reviewed by:
No items found.
Expert opinion provided by:
No items found.
Commentary & research by:
Sapna Peruvemba, MS, RDN (Volunteer)
Researcher & Fact-Checker (Volunteer)
Share this post
Explore more on these topics:
Carnivore Diet
Type 2 Diabetes

Foodfacts.org is an independent non-profit fact-checking platform dedicated to exposing misinformation in the food industry. We provide transparent, science-based insights on nutrition, health, and environmental impacts, empowering consumers to make informed choices for a healthier society and planet.

Your Top Questions
No items found.

🛡️ Stand Against Nutrition Misinformation

Misinformation is a growing threat to our health and planet. At FoodFacts.org, we're dedicated to exposing the truth behind misleading food narratives. But we can't do it without your support.
‍
Your monthly donation can:

✅ Combat viral diet myths and corporate spin
✅ Support our team of dedicated fact-checkers and educators
✅ Keep our myth-busting platforms running

Support Us

Was this article helpful?

We use this feedback to improve foodfacts.org
Yes
No
Spotted a problem? Send us feedback
Back to top
Source of Claim/s
TYPE OF MEDIA
Social Media Post
CREATOR
Lucy Fabbri
Health Professional
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
United Kingdom

Ready to take action?

You have the power to make a difference 3 times a day.
Join us in promoting honest nutrition and wellness, whilst challenging misinformation.

Get Inspired Today!
Get the latest articles
You're all set! We've added you to our newsletter.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Follow Us
Trust foodfacts.org for credible, science-backed information that cuts through food industry misinformation and empowers you to make informed choices.

ai powered chat bot experience provided by Elevenlabs
Article

Top Myths

Latest

The Climate Crisis
Politics Of Food
Health
Food Systems
Media Literacy
Popular Media
Ethics
Environment
Nutrition
Take Action
Partner Organisations
About
Fact Checking PoliciesOur Funding/DisclosuresThe TeamOrganisational StructureIndependence & TransparencyAi Usage PolicyAdvisory BoardMedia MentionsFAQsGlossaryXML News Feed
Contact
Report Mis/DisinformationSend Feedback
Privacy Policy  
Terms & Conditions © 2024
Freedom Food Alliance is a non-profit organisation. (no. 15414442) limited by guarantee and registered in England and Wales.
‍
© Copyright 2025 Freedom Food Alliance.  Launched in 2025. 🇬🇧 Grown in the United Kingdom.

How was this article helpful?

This article changed my life!
This article was informative
I have a medical question
This article changed my life!
Change
Thank you! Your feedback has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
This article was informative
Change
Thank you! Your feedback has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
x icon in black

How can we improve this article

This article contains incorrect information
This article doesn't have the information that I'm looking for
I have a medical question
This article contains incorrect information
Change
Thank you! Your feedback has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
This article doesn't have the information that I'm looking for
Change
Thank you! Your feedback has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
x icon in black