Restart

Cancel

Powered by AI

The information provided by this chatbot is generated by AI and intended for general guidance only; it should not replace professional advice.

hey

hey

The most accurate, science-backed information about our food.

Popular topics

Orlando! Your health, nutrition and food fact-checking buddy!

Search results

Latest Articles

See all latest articles

Popular Fact-Checks

A person stands on a colorful digital scale, reflecting the idea of weight tracking. This visual relates to the article "Eddie Abbew Claims Calorie Deficit Concern Fat Loss," which explores the importance of understanding calorie deficits for successful fat loss. The image aligns with the discussion on how people often track their weight to assess progress in weight management or fat loss plans.

Eddie Abbew claims calorie deficit should not be the main concern with fat loss. What does the data say?

Eddie Abbew questions the calorie deficit model—but this article explains why fat loss still depends on it, with some key context

A stylized digital illustration of a high-protein meal spread, featuring various foods like eggs, beef, salmon, cheese, tofu, black beans, broccoli, and couscous, all arranged neatly on colorful plates and bowls—visually highlighting diverse sources of dietary protein from both animal and plant origins.

The Facts About Protein: Why Science Says More Isn’t Always Better

The Glucose Goddess claims that we should all aim for 2g of protein per kg of body weight every day. What do the experts think?

A person comparing two bottles of omega-3 tablets. The one on the left comes from fish, whereas the one on the right comes from plants, relating to the debate about the best sources of Omega-3 fatty acids.

Omega-3 Fatty Acids: Evaluating the Role of Fish and Plant Sources.

It's true that fish sources of Omega-3 fatty acids are better than most plant-based ones, but fish get their omega's from this super water-plant source

Illustration of a muscular man in a black tank top confidently holding a large plate of red meat while holding up his hand to reject scientific studies, heart health data, and a clipboard—symbolizing a dismissal of mainstream nutritional science. This image relates to Eddie Abbew’s controversial claim that eating only red meat for a month reduces inflammation and poses no health risks, despite scientific consensus to the contrary. Featured in FoodFacts.org’s analysis of misinformation around red meat and chronic disease risk.

Eddie Abbew’s claims on red meat: what you need to know

Eddie Abbew claims that eating red meat only for a month is the best way to reduce inflammation. We fact check his claims against the balance of available evidence on this important question.

See all fact checks

Popular Opinions

An illustration features a person's torso above a table filled with various items associated with wellness and health, including colorful pills, supplements, fruit-shaped objects, and bottles of liquid. A blue bin overflowing with pills is prominent in the foreground. This imagery represents the confusing and potentially harmful landscape of wellness misinformation, as exemplified by the Belle Gibson scandal.

The Belle Gibson Scandal: How Wellness Misinformation Endangers Public Health

When Belle Gibson lied about curing her cancer by eating fruits and vegetables, it wasn't just morally wrong, it was a threat to public health.

Illustration of a confused shopper in a grocery store aisle, surrounded by various plant-based and animal-based protein options like tofu, beans, sausages, and meat. The image captures consumer hesitation amid a changing food landscape.

Unpacking the Shift: Why Consumers Are Moving Away from Plant-Based Meat

SPOILER - Yes, plant-based meat sales have dropped, but it's because people are swapping to less processed plant-based proteins.

A confused-looking man stands between two animated health professionals, each holding documents and passionately explaining. Question marks hover above their heads, symbolizing conflicting advice. This image reflects the theme of the article, which questions who is truly qualified to give nutrition advice and highlights the confusion caused by misinformation and differing expert opinions.

Who's really qualified to give nutrition advice online? Here’s what you need to know

Having abs doesn’t make you a nutrition expert—credentials do.

Illustration of a concerned group of scientists and experts standing behind a glass wall, looking into an empty boardroom with microphones and scattered papers. A sign on the roundtable reads "DISBANDED – Food Safety Advisory Committee." This image illustrates the article’s focus on the dissolution of key food safety committees in the U.S., raising concerns about reduced oversight and transparency in decisions affecting public health.

Food Safety in Peril: Why Cutting Key Committees Puts Millions at Risk

Food Safety Committees have recently been disbanded by the White House. We explore what impact this will have on consumers.

A digital illustration shows two people sat across from each other. This visual complements the article "Are Podcast Hosts Spreading Health Misinformation? What the Latest Studies Reveal," which discusses how misinformation can spread through podcasts, particularly in health and wellness discussions. The article emphasizes the need for critical thinking and fact-checking to navigate misleading or unverified claims made by podcast hosts.

Steven Bartlett’s Podcast and the Spread of Health Misinformation: A Doctor’s Response

From Mic to Myth: The Alarming Rise of Health Misinformation in Podcasts

A variety of glass bottles filled with different oils are displayed on a wooden surface, surrounded by whole food sources like avocados, almonds, soybeans, and flaxseeds. This image reflects the themes of the article, which explores the risks of seed oil mislabeling, allergy concerns, and misinformation—highlighting the importance of transparency and accuracy in food labeling and nutritional guidance.

Understanding seed oil cards: the risks of mislabelling allergies

Seed oil cards may look helpful—but when they spread myths and miss allergy risks, they’re more harm than hack.

Two individuals sit facing each other in a vividly stylized, surreal environment filled with bold, geometric shapes and gradients of neon pink, green, and yellow. One wears a black hat and long hair, the other has short hair, both dressed in dark shirts—suggesting a dramatic or contemplative encounter in a dreamlike or metaphorical setting.

Are Podcast Hosts Spreading Health Misinformation? What the Latest Studies Reveal

Podcast hosts can unknowingly spread health misinformation—learn how to spot and avoid it.

See all opinions

Arm yourself with knowledge.

Dive into our collection of resources to uncover the facts behind today’s food system. From the environmental impact of food choices to the truth about nutrition claims, we’ve got you covered. Equip yourself to make informed, empowered decisions every day.

Help us fight false information.

Every day, we work to uncover the truth about our food system, empowering informed choices for a healthier planet. Support from people like you helps us research, publish, and advocate for transparent food policies and honest labeling. Join us in driving meaningful change!

Report Dis/Misinformation

Ready To Take Action?

Get the latest articles

You're all set! We've added you to our newsletter.

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Follow Us

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions © 2024