foodfacts logo
  • Articles
    
    Latest
    arrow pointing right
    All Fact Checks
    arrow pointing right
    Guides
    arrow pointing right
    Features
    arrow pointing right
    Opinion Pieces
    arrow pointing right
    Topics
    The Climate Crisis
    Politics Of Food
    Health
    Food Systems
    Media Literacy
    Popular Media
    Ethics
    Environment
    Nutrition
    Trending Tags
    Supplements
    Vitamins
    Acidic Foods
    Alkaline Diets
    Autism Spectrum Disorder
    Education
    Microwaves
    Artificial Intelligence
    Lab-Grown Meat
    (UPF) Ultra Processed Foods
    Chemophobia
    Precision Livestock Farming (PLF)
    Manosphere
    Net Zero
    Glossary
    arrow pointing right
    Fact Checks
    Is excess iron a cancer risk? Debunking Dr Eric Berg’s claim with peer-reviewed evidence
    Does yoghurt cause gut disruption?
    “I changed my diet and got pregnant”: What’s the evidence behind these claims?
  • Take Action
  • About
    
    • About
    • The Team
    • Fact Checking Policies
    • Funding/Disclosures
    • Advisory Board
    • Media Mentions
    • FAQs
  • Watchlist
Report MisinfoSupport Us
Home
/
Articles
/
Fact Check
/
Health
/
A smiling pregnant woman stands in a warmly lit kitchen, gently cradling her baby bump, surrounded by potted plants and soft sunlight. The peaceful, nurturing scene contrasts with the article’s urgent warning that vegan pregnancies may carry a heightened risk of deadly complications like preeclampsia, underscoring the tension between idealized imagery of plant-based motherhood and emerging medical concerns about nutrient deficiencies.
clock icon
Summary
3
 min read
Article
3
 min read
Dig Deeper
3
 min read
Resources
SOURCE:
Fact Check

'Pregnant vegans warned of deadly complications' media cites study on preeclampsia; is there cause for concern?

Commentary by
Isabelle Sadler
Elise Hutchinson, PhD
Expert Review by
Dr Shireen Kassam
Fact-check by
Isabelle Sadler
Elise Hutchinson, PhD
Published:
September 18, 2024
,
Updated:
August 5, 2025
clock icon
Summary
3
 min read
clock icon
Article
3
 min read
clock icon
Details
3
 min read
clock icon
Resources
3
 min read
Share

🔊Listen to the article

Loading the Elevenlabs Text to Speech AudioNative Player...
Fact Score:
What is the fact score?
i
Red: False
Coral Red: Mostly False
Orange: Misleading
Yellow: Mostly True
Green: True

Learn more about our fact-checking policies
Introduction

Daily Mail, Diabetes UK and NY Post published reports suggesting pregnant vegans may be at higher risk of a life-threatening condition, following the release of a study by researchers in Denmark.

‍This new study has indicated that being vegan during pregnancy may raise the risk of preeclampsia, a condition that affects some pregnant women, usually during the second half of pregnancy (from 20 weeks) or soon after their baby is delivered. Publications such as the Daily Mail and Diabetes.co.uk reported on this study, with some suggesting a clear link between vegan diets and preeclampsia. The Daily Mail also issued a ‘warning’ to vegan mothers, which could create fears around plant-based diets.

This analysis seeks to discuss the study’s findings in light of the current evidence on dietary requirements during pregnancy and includes reactions from experts in the field.

TLDR; (Let's get to the point)
IN A NUTSHELL:
The sensational headlines from media outlets about higher risks of deadly complications from vegan pregnancies are misleading and fear-inducing. The study's findings do not warrant such alarm and emphasise the need for a balanced, nutrient-rich diet during pregnancy, regardless of dietary pattern.

‍Key concerns explained

Lower Birth Weight: In the study, babies born to vegan mothers had an average weight of 240g less than those born to omnivorous mothers. Most were in the normal weight range, and many factors could explain this difference.‍

Increased Risk of Preeclampsia: Vegan women showed a higher rate of preeclampsia compared to omnivores. This does not reflect previous study findings and could likely be a spurious result given that only 2 pregnancies were affected.

WHY SHOULD YOU KEEP SCROLLING? 👇👇

Sensational headlines have the capacity to distort findings from scientific studies and cause unnecessary alarm. Keep reading to fully explore the implications of this study for pregnant women.

Fact checked by
Isabelle Sadler

Context Matters: A study might sound compelling in isolation, but check if it aligns with broader research on the topic.

Dig deeper
What’s the full story? Keep reading for our expert analysis.

The research involved 66,738 pregnancies, where self-reported dietary patterns split the mothers; this included 65 872 omnivores, 666 fish/poultry vegetarians, 183 lacto/ovo vegetarians, and 18 vegans. The participants completed a food frequency questionnaire 25 weeks into their pregnancy to assess their dietary and supplement intake.

The study found that protein intake was lower among lacto/ovo-vegetarians (13.3%) and vegans (10.4%) than among omnivorous participants (15.4%). When considering dietary and supplement intake, no significant differences in micronutrient intake were observed between the groups.

Compared with omnivorous mothers, vegans had a higher rate of preeclampsia, and their offspring had, on average, 240g lower birth weight. Preeclampsia is a condition that causes high blood pressure during pregnancy and after labour. Additionally, pregnancies were 5.2 days longer among vegan women.

The study is observational despite these findings, meaning it can’t draw a cause-and-effect relationship. Additionally, several limitations in this study, such as the very small number of vegans compared to omnivores, prevent any definite conclusions. Besides, the recruitment period was over 20 years ago, from 1996-2002, when knowledge of and support for vegan pregnancies was in its infancy. Although no definite claims can be made, the study does point to the need for further research.

‍

‍

EXPERT WEIGH-IN

I don't believe the lower intake of protein is responsible for the lower birth weight. Babies in the vegan group were as long as the others; they were thinner, but 90% of them were within the normal range, which is what matters. Omnivorous mothers had a high frequency of being overweight, 27% versus 18% in vegans, and this alone could explain much of the difference in birth weight.

‍

Dr Miriam Martinez Biarge, MD, PhD

The study also does not report on adverse outcomes for larger babies. Dr. Martinez Biarge says, “Why didn't they report on the percentage of large for gestational age babies, those with abnormally high weight? Every obstetrician and every paediatrician knows this is an important adverse outcome in pregnancy.”

This is an important result missing from the study, as research suggests that the percentage of babies with an abnormally large weight may be higher among omnivorous mothers and is associated with complications during labour, both in the short and long term. This could also explain the higher number of induced labours and caesarean sections in the omnivores in this study.

“In the end, we know that women with lower BMI at the start of pregnancy and low weight gain during pregnancy are at risk of having smaller foetuses, whatever their diet. The point is that vegan mothers have a higher frequency of lower BMI and lower weight gain, probably because of lower caloric intake. Identifying these women and increasing energy intake would solve the problem in almost all cases.”

It’s worth noting that other studies have found a lower birth weight in vegan babies, and vegan children tend to be a bit shorter. However, these results often fall within the normal range for birth weight, and no evidence has suggested this results in future health issues.

The current study does not address the longer-term health of these children.

‍

EXPERT WEIGH-IN

Although the overall number of women included in this study was large at over 65,000, the studies only included 18 people who identified as being vegan. The very small number of vegans who took part means that there is a risk of statistical error and that could explain the higher rates of pre-eclampsia reported in vegans. As there were only two women who presented with pre-eclampsia who were vegan, it could be due to variability and chance. This study aimed to consider protein as a mediating factor, which, due to the small number of women who were vegan in the study, makes it very hard to fully interpret any meaning from this data.

Dr Miriam Martinez Biarge, MD, PhD
Dr Duane Mellor
Registered dietician and senior lecturer at Aston Medical School, Aston.

Key takeaways

The critical takeaway is that pregnant women should pay close attention to their diet to ensure they get all the necessary nutrients. This is also true for women who wish to pursue a plant-based diet during pregnancy.

“It can be more challenging to follow a vegan diet to ensure that it is nutritionally complete, as there can be risks of lower intakes of iron, iodine and vitamins B12 and D, which can affect the health of both the mother, along with the development of the baby,” says Dr Duane Mellor.

“When planning a pregnancy and during pregnancy, whatever your dietary patterns and preferences, it is key to eat a varied and balanced diet, including supplements as advised by government and health guidelines. If a diet is balanced and includes the necessary nutrients including protein, vitamins and minerals, the type of diet is not as important.”

A 2019 review supports this by concluding, “Vegetarians and vegans are at risk of nutritional deficiencies, but if the adequate intake of nutrients is upheld, pregnancy outcomes are similar to those reported in the omnivorous population. So updated evidence highlights that well-balanced vegetarian and vegan diets should be considered safe for the mother’s health and offspring during pregnancy and lactation.”

“The vegetarian-type pattern should be considered safe, and it is not associated with preterm birth, birth weight, or small for gestational age if the requirements are met.”

Headlines generally aim to grab the readers’ attention while only capturing the gist of an article. When reporting on this study, the tone adopted by certain headlines seems alarming; for example, the Daily Mail summed up the study as follows: "Pregnant women urged not to go vegan over risk of deadly complications." However, this does not align with the recommendations from experts.

‍

EXPERT WEIGH-IN
Dr Miriam Martinez Biarge, MD, PhD
Dr Duane Mellor
Registered dietician and senior lecturer at Aston Medical School, Aston.

If you are considering a plant-based pregnancy, consider the following resources for more information:

Plant Based Health Professionals UK: Pregnancy and Children

British Nutrition Foundation: Vegetarian and vegan diets during pregnancy

‍

Sources

Avnon, T. et al. (2020). The impact of a vegan diet on pregnancy outcomes. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41372-020-00804-x

Hedegaard, S. et al. (2024). Adherence to different forms of plant-based diets and pregnancy outcomes in the Danish National Birth Cohort: A prospective observational study.https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14778

Kesary, Y. et al. (2020). Maternal plant-based diet during gestation and pregnancy outcomes. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-020-05689-x

NHS. Pre-eclempsia. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/pre-eclampsia/

Sebastiani, G. et al. (2019). The Effects of Vegetarian and Vegan Diet during Pregnancy on the Health of Mothers and Offspring. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6470702/

Expert reviewed by:
Dr Shireen Kassam
Haematologist and founder Plant-Based Health Professionals UK
Expert opinion provided by:
Dr Miriam Martinez Biarge, MD, PhD
Dr Duane Mellor
Registered dietician and senior lecturer at Aston Medical School, Aston.
Commentary & research by:
Isabelle Sadler
Cofounder & Research Lead (Volunteer)
Elise Hutchinson, PhD
Cofounder & Research Director (Volunteer)
Share this post
Explore more on these topics:
Pregnancy
Vegan Diet

Foodfacts.org is an independent non-profit fact-checking platform dedicated to exposing misinformation in the food industry. We provide transparent, science-based insights on nutrition, health, and environmental impacts, empowering consumers to make informed choices for a healthier society and planet.

Your Top Questions
No items found.

🛡️ Stand Against Nutrition Misinformation

Misinformation is a growing threat to our health and planet. At FoodFacts.org, we're dedicated to exposing the truth behind misleading food narratives. But we can't do it without your support.
‍
Your monthly donation can:

✅ Combat viral diet myths and corporate spin
✅ Support our team of dedicated fact-checkers and educators
✅ Keep our myth-busting platforms running

Support Us

Was this article helpful?

We use this feedback to improve foodfacts.org
Yes
No
Spotted a problem? Send us feedback
Back to top
Source of Claim/s
TYPE OF MEDIA
News Article
CREATOR
Emily Stearn
Journalist
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
United Kingdom

Ready to take action?

You have the power to make a difference 3 times a day.
Join us in promoting honest nutrition and wellness, whilst challenging misinformation.

Get Inspired Today!
Get the latest articles
You're all set! We've added you to our newsletter.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Follow Us
Trust foodfacts.org for credible, science-backed information that cuts through food industry misinformation and empowers you to make informed choices.

ai powered chat bot experience provided by Elevenlabs
Article

Top Myths

Latest

The Climate Crisis
Politics Of Food
Health
Food Systems
Media Literacy
Popular Media
Ethics
Environment
Nutrition
Take Action
Partner Organisations
About
Fact Checking PoliciesOur Funding/DisclosuresThe TeamOrganisational StructureIndependence & TransparencyAi Usage PolicyAdvisory BoardMedia MentionsFAQsGlossaryXML News Feed
Contact
Report Mis/DisinformationSend Feedback
Privacy Policy  
Terms & Conditions © 2024
Freedom Food Alliance is a non-profit organisation. (no. 15414442) limited by guarantee and registered in England and Wales.
‍
© Copyright 2025 Freedom Food Alliance.  Launched in 2025. 🇬🇧 Grown in the United Kingdom.

How was this article helpful?

This article changed my life!
This article was informative
I have a medical question
This article changed my life!
Change
Thank you! Your feedback has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
This article was informative
Change
Thank you! Your feedback has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
x icon in black

How can we improve this article

This article contains incorrect information
This article doesn't have the information that I'm looking for
I have a medical question
This article contains incorrect information
Change
Thank you! Your feedback has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
This article doesn't have the information that I'm looking for
Change
Thank you! Your feedback has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
x icon in black