foodfacts logo
  • Articles
    
    Latest
    arrow pointing right
    All Fact Checks
    arrow pointing right
    Guides
    arrow pointing right
    Features
    arrow pointing right
    Opinion Pieces
    arrow pointing right
    Topics
    The Climate Crisis
    Politics Of Food
    Health
    Food Systems
    Media Literacy
    Popular Media
    Ethics
    Environment
    Nutrition
    Trending Tags
    Supplements
    Vitamins
    Acidic Foods
    Alkaline Diets
    Autism Spectrum Disorder
    Education
    Microwaves
    Artificial Intelligence
    Lab-Grown Meat
    (UPF) Ultra Processed Foods
    Chemophobia
    Precision Livestock Farming (PLF)
    Manosphere
    Net Zero
    Glossary
    arrow pointing right
    Fact Checks
    Is excess iron a cancer risk? Debunking Dr Eric Berg’s claim with peer-reviewed evidence
    Does yoghurt cause gut disruption?
    “I changed my diet and got pregnant”: What’s the evidence behind these claims?
  • Take Action
  • About
    
    • About
    • The Team
    • Fact Checking Policies
    • Funding/Disclosures
    • Advisory Board
    • Media Mentions
    • FAQs
  • Watchlist
Report MisinfoSupport Us
Home
/
Articles
/
Fact Check
/
Health
/
A young woman drinks her coffee, concerned that it may be increasing her risk of esophageal cancer?
clock icon
Summary
3
 min read
Article
3
 min read
Dig Deeper
3
 min read
Resources
SOURCE:
Fact Check

Do very hot tea or coffee raise the risk of esophageal cancer?

Commentary by
Laurens van Oers MSc (Volunteer)
Expert Review by
No items found.
Fact-check by
Laurens van Oers MSc (Volunteer)
Published:
September 11, 2025
,
Updated:
December 4, 2025
clock icon
Summary
3
 min read
clock icon
Article
3
 min read
clock icon
Details
3
 min read
clock icon
Resources
3
 min read
Share

🔊Listen to the article

Loading the Elevenlabs Text to Speech AudioNative Player...
Fact Score:
What is the fact score?
i
Red: False
Coral Red: Mostly False
Orange: Misleading
Yellow: Mostly True
Green: True

Learn more about our fact-checking policies
Introduction

A UK newspaper reported that drinking very hot tea or coffee could raise your risk of cancers of the oesophagus (food pipe), citing a large UK Biobank study. Here’s what the science actually says, in plain language, and how this fits alongside what we know about coffee, tea and health more broadly.

TLDR; (Let's get to the point)
IN A NUTSHELL:
The claims made in the article are mostly accurate, but they are missing crucial context.

Drinking lots of tea or coffee when it’s very hot may raise the risk of cancer of the oesophagus because of the heat, not the drink itself. Letting it cool a little is sufficient to reduce the risk. Moderate, not-too-hot tea and coffee are part of a healthy, hydrating routine.

The findings from the latest UK Biobank analysis relate to temperature (thermal injury) rather than coffee or tea as ingredients.

WHY SHOULD YOU KEEP SCROLLING? 👇👇

Hot drinks are part of daily life; many people worldwide rely on hot coffee or tea to kickstart and fuel their workdays. Most people don’t read beyond the headline, which is why framing matters. When headlines oversimplify or misrepresent the science, they can fuel unnecessary worry about everyday habits like drinking tea or coffee. This not only risks making people anxious for no good reason, but also chips away at scientific literacy. For instance, when animal studies are quoted without proper context, readers may be left unable to judge what the findings really mean for humans, or how big the actual risk might be. Clear communication helps people understand the evidence, weigh risks sensibly, and make informed choices about their health.

Fact checked by
Laurens van Oers MSc (Volunteer)

Avoid Clickbait Traps: Headlines can be misleading. Read beyond the headline to understand the real story.

Dig deeper
What’s the full story? Keep reading for our expert analysis.

Claim 1: Your risk of developing oesophageal cancer is increased if you drink tea, coffee or other drinks at hot temperatures.

‍

Fact-check: The claim that oesophageal cancer risk increases if you drink hot tea, coffee or other drinks lacks context. Let’s take a closer look at the study on which the Express’ article is based to get a better understanding of the links between coffee or tea consumption and cancer. 

What the new UK study actually found

According to a large UK Biobank analysis, 454,796 adults were followed for about 12 years and reported both how many cups of tea/coffee they drank and whether they preferred them warm, hot or very hot. The researchers in this study observed that, compared with people who drank warm drinks, choosing hot beverages was linked to a higher risk of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) as daily cups increased. The association was stronger for very hot drinks: for example, ≤4 cups/day was linked to roughly 2.5×higher ESCC risk, and >8 cups/day to around 5.6× higher risk.

Importantly, the same study found no clear association between drink temperature and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), which is a different type of oesophageal cancer. 

Absolute numbers of cancer cases remained small (242 ESCC cases and 710 EAC cases), so the individual risk is low in the UK setting according to the analysis. The results were adjusted for factors such as age, sex, smoking and alcohol, but as an observational study they cannot prove that hot drinks cause cancer. This is mainly because the data gathered in this study was self-reported data, such as the temperature of the drinks when consumed, although follow-up checks suggested the results were fairly reliable.

Overall, the pattern suggests a dose–temperature relationship for ESCC that fits with prior evidence from high-risk settings where measured very-hot tea has been linked to higher ESCC risk.

‍

Is it the drink or the temperature?

Evidence points to temperature, not the drink itself, as the main concern: the WHO’s cancer agency (IARC) classifies very hot beverages (typically >65 °C) as “probably carcinogenic to humans” based on studies of thermal injury and ESCC.
In the Golestan study in Iran, investigators measured tea temperature and found higher future ESCC risk among people who drank very hot tea compared with cooler tea, reinforcing that heat, not tea, drives risk. 

The new UK Biobank results fit this picture, showing higher ESCC risk with increasing temperature preference and number of daily cups, while finding no clear link with EAC. 

Animal experiments add biological plausibility: repeated exposure to 70 °C water promoted esophageal cancer risk in mice compared with a chemical carcinogen alone (a substance known to cause cancer in laboratory settings), according to this study. 

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) also notes that coffee itself is not classified as carcinogenic at usual drinking temperatures, which aligns with the wider literature on coffee’s health profile (The Lancet, BMJ).

Practically, simple changes (letting drinks cool, adding a splash of milk or water, and avoiding gulping many scalding cups) are sensible ways to reduce any thermal-injury risk while keeping the everyday benefits of tea and coffee.

‍

Coffee and tea and overall health

It’s vital that research findings are shared with the public, but without the right context they can easily create a distorted sense of risk, especially for people without a science background. In the case of coffee and tea, the story is not only about possible risks from very hot drinks, but also about the well-documented health benefits these beverages can offer when enjoyed in moderation.

‍

Coffee and tea can both sit comfortably in a healthy, everyday diet. According to a large umbrella review in the BMJ, people who drink about three to four cups of coffee a day tend to have lower risks of early death and cardiovascular disease compared with non-drinkers. A separate meta-analysis (a meta-analysis is when scientists combine the results of many separate studies on the same topic to get a clearer overall picture of what the evidence shows) suggests both caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee are linked with a reduced risk of type 2 diabetes, pointing to components beyond caffeine that may be helpful. For tea, scientists analysing the UK Biobank reported that those drinking two or more cups of black tea daily had a modestly lower risk of death from any cause.

How you brew coffee also matters for cholesterol. Randomised controlled trials (source 1, source 2) show that unfiltered coffee (such as boiled coffee or cafetière/French press) contains natural oils (cafestol and kahweol) that can raise LDL (“bad”) cholesterol. Using a paper filter largely removes these oils, so if your LDL is high, scientists recommend opting for paper-filtered coffee as a simple, evidence-based tweak.

On caffeine, European safety assessors conclude that up to 400 mg per day is a safe level for most healthy, non-pregnant adults (roughly four to five small coffees, or six to eight teas, depending on strength), while around 200 mg per day is the advised upper limit during pregnancy. Sensitivity varies: if caffeine makes you jittery or affects your sleep, cutting back or choosing decaf is sensible.

What about hydration? Despite the old myth, research does not support the idea that tea and coffee “dehydrate” you at typical intakes. In the randomised cross-over study, habitual coffee drinkers who consumed several cups of coffee per day showed no differences from water in total body water, urine volume or blood markers of hydration. Reflecting this evidence, European guidance counts all beverages, including caffeinated ones, towards your daily fluid intake targets. In practice, that means your cups of tea or coffee can help meet your fluid needs.

‍

Final take-away

Two practical tips tie this together. First, the temperature matters for oesophageal comfort and safety: let hot drinks cool a little or add a splash of milk or water before sipping. Second, enjoy coffee and tea mostly unsweetened; keeping added sugars low supports cardiometabolic health. With these simple steps, coffee and tea can be enjoyable, hydrating parts of a balanced diet.

‍

‍

We have contacted Express and are awaiting a response.

Disclaimer

This fact-check is intended to provide information based on available scientific evidence. It should not be considered as medical advice. For personalised health guidance, consult with a qualified healthcare professional.

EXPERT WEIGH-IN
No items found.
EXPERT WEIGH-IN
No items found.
EXPERT WEIGH-IN
No items found.

Sources

‍

Inoue-Choi, M. et al. (2022) ‘Tea consumption and all-cause and cause-specific mortality in the UK Biobank: a prospective cohort study’.
Islami, F. et al. (2019) ‘A prospective study of tea drinking temperature and risk of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma’.
Loomis, D. et al. (2016) ‘Carcinogenicity of drinking coffee, mate, and very hot beverages’

Rapozo, D.C.M. et al. (2016) ‘Recurrent acute thermal lesion induces oesophageal hyperproliferative premalignant lesions in mouse oesophagus’.
Poole, R. et al. (2017) ‘Coffee consumption and health: umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies and randomised controlled trials’.

Ding, M. et al. (2014) ‘Caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis’.

Greyling, A. et al. (2014) ‘The effect of black tea on blood pressure: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials’.

Jee, S.H. et al. (2001) ‘Coffee consumption and serum lipids: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled clinical trials’.

Cai, L. et al. (2012) ‘The effect of coffee consumption on serum lipids: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials’.

Maughan, R.J. et al. (2016) ‘A randomised trial to assess the potential of different beverages to affect hydration status: development of a beverage hydration index’.

Inoue-Choi, M. et al. (2025) ‘Hot beverage intake and oesophageal cancer in the UK Biobank: prospective cohort study’.
EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (2015) ‘Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine’.

Killer, S.C. et al. (2014) ‘No evidence of dehydration with moderate daily coffee intake: a counterbalanced cross-over study in a free-living population’.

Expert reviewed by:
No items found.
Expert opinion provided by:
No items found.
Commentary & research by:
Laurens van Oers MSc (Volunteer)
Researcher & Fact-Checker (Volunteer)
Share this post
Explore more on these topics:
Coffee
Cancer

Foodfacts.org is an independent non-profit fact-checking platform dedicated to exposing misinformation in the food industry. We provide transparent, science-based insights on nutrition, health, and environmental impacts, empowering consumers to make informed choices for a healthier society and planet.

Your Top Questions
No items found.

🛡️ Stand Against Nutrition Misinformation

Misinformation is a growing threat to our health and planet. At FoodFacts.org, we're dedicated to exposing the truth behind misleading food narratives. But we can't do it without your support.
‍
Your monthly donation can:

✅ Combat viral diet myths and corporate spin
✅ Support our team of dedicated fact-checkers and educators
✅ Keep our myth-busting platforms running

Support Us

Was this article helpful?

We use this feedback to improve foodfacts.org
Yes
No
Spotted a problem? Send us feedback
Back to top
Source of Claim/s
TYPE OF MEDIA
News Article
CREATOR
Hanna Geissler
Journalist
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
United Kingdom

Ready to take action?

You have the power to make a difference 3 times a day.
Join us in promoting honest nutrition and wellness, whilst challenging misinformation.

Get Inspired Today!
Get the latest articles
You're all set! We've added you to our newsletter.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Follow Us
Trust foodfacts.org for credible, science-backed information that cuts through food industry misinformation and empowers you to make informed choices.

ai powered chat bot experience provided by Elevenlabs
Article

Top Myths

Latest

The Climate Crisis
Politics Of Food
Health
Food Systems
Media Literacy
Popular Media
Ethics
Environment
Nutrition
Take Action
Partner Organisations
About
Fact Checking PoliciesOur Funding/DisclosuresThe TeamOrganisational StructureIndependence & TransparencyAi Usage PolicyAdvisory BoardMedia MentionsFAQsGlossaryXML News Feed
Contact
Report Mis/DisinformationSend Feedback
Privacy Policy  
Terms & Conditions © 2024
Freedom Food Alliance is a non-profit organisation. (no. 15414442) limited by guarantee and registered in England and Wales.
‍
© Copyright 2025 Freedom Food Alliance.  Launched in 2025. 🇬🇧 Grown in the United Kingdom.

How was this article helpful?

This article changed my life!
This article was informative
I have a medical question
This article changed my life!
Change
Thank you! Your feedback has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
This article was informative
Change
Thank you! Your feedback has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
x icon in black

How can we improve this article

This article contains incorrect information
This article doesn't have the information that I'm looking for
I have a medical question
This article contains incorrect information
Change
Thank you! Your feedback has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
This article doesn't have the information that I'm looking for
Change
Thank you! Your feedback has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
x icon in black